This is a test of GDPR / Cookie Acceptance [about our cookies]
Really irritating test - cookie expires in 24 hour!
Great Western Coffee Shop
Recent Public Posts - [guest]
Seven young people sought after assault on Elizabeth Line
In "London to Reading" [375717/32095/7]
Posted by Marlburian at 12:14, 2nd June 2026
Already liked by GBM
 
A group of teenagers assaulted multiple passengers during a violent attack.

Images released three weeks after the incident. I don't suppose that the alleged perpetrators cared that they were being video'd. and perhaps they aren't worried about the likely slaps on their wrists should they be located and charged.

Re: New station at North Filton - now named as 'Bristol Brabazon' - ongoing discussion
In "Bristol and Bath (WECA, now WEMCA)" [375716/24927/21]
Posted by johnneyw at 11:15, 2nd June 2026
 
Rail Advent has an article regarding the latest at Brabazon with he accessible lift now installed.  There's pictures on the link below.

https://www.railadvent.co.uk/2026/06/installation-progress-made-at-new-bristol-station.html

Re: Why are these people travelling by train?
In "Introductions and chat" [375715/32090/1]
Posted by grahame at 10:58, 2nd June 2026
 
I haven't travelled much overseas recently (well not at all...) but is the provision of information better when things go wrong?

My last couple of trips West Wales to South East England all had issues but it was the lack of information that frustrated me most.

Welllll ... usually but it wasn't this morning.   Quick connection at Jelenice and train manager assured me it would wait ... but it didn't. Basically kills day's plan - going somewhere else now.   Ah - the frustration of a service that only runs every 2 or 3 hours and then this happens!

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026
In "Across the West" [375714/31163/26]
Posted by TaplowGreen at 10:48, 2nd June 2026
 
And in a bit of comedy timing, whilst all the disruption continues, the regulator ORR has decided to issue a letter to Network Rail Western saying ORR is satisfied with their performance and improvement.

Even includes :
A major area of focus has been the Thames Valley and Network Rail has carried out a high volume of asset interventions concentrating on track, overhead line equipment, axle counters and points.

https://www.orr.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2026-06/2026-06-01-nr-wales-and-western-compliance.pdf

So apparently ORR thinks the interventions are good enough, even though failures are continuing.  Words fail me.

Genuinely couldn't make it up

https://www.railmagazine.com/news/network-rail-improvements-lead-to-end-of-enforcement-action-on-poor-performance

Rothbury Publishing to close
In "Media about railways, and other means of transport" [375713/32094/49]
Posted by bobm at 10:43, 2nd June 2026
 
Just had this in my email

It is with a heavy heart we have to announce:

Rothbury Publishing is being Discontinued.

Over the last 12 years we have enjoyed working with you and launching new cards, new products and sending out orders on a daily basis.

Sadly since covid those daily orders became more sporadic and whilst we have a core or regular trade buyers and retail customers, but a combination of postage costs and the challenges in retail shops we have seen orders reduce to a level that makes the associated overheads with Rothbury too high.

For those not familiar they have produced a large range of greetings cards on a transport theme using artists' paintings and drawings.  They have been on sale in many heritage railway gift shops across the country.

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026
In "Across the West" [375712/31163/26]
Posted by John D at 10:36, 2nd June 2026
Already liked by GBM
 
And in a bit of comedy timing, whilst all the disruption continues, the regulator ORR has decided to issue a letter to Network Rail Western saying ORR is satisfied with their performance and improvement.

Even includes :
A major area of focus has been the Thames Valley and Network Rail has carried out a high volume of asset interventions concentrating on track, overhead line equipment, axle counters and points.

https://www.orr.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2026-06/2026-06-01-nr-wales-and-western-compliance.pdf

So apparently ORR thinks the interventions are good enough, even though failures are continuing.  Words fail me.

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026
In "Across the West" [375711/31163/26]
Posted by TaplowGreen at 10:25, 2nd June 2026
 
Disruption pushed out till midday now - last couple of weeks have been shambolic on this line - with so many people relying on the Elizabeth Line thanks to the RMT Tube strike today it makes the situation even worse.

Re: Why are these people travelling by train?
In "Introductions and chat" [375710/32090/1]
Posted by Sixty3Closure at 10:06, 2nd June 2026
 
I haven't travelled much overseas recently (well not at all...) but is the provision of information better when things go wrong?

My last couple of trips West Wales to South East England all had issues but it was the lack of information that frustrated me most.

Re: Why are these people travelling by train?
In "Introductions and chat" [375709/32090/1]
Posted by ChrisB at 10:00, 2nd June 2026
 
In my view, the moving of TOCs from private contractors to public operators is something of a side issue

Yet, completely Political decision. Get it right & it will still pull passengers, regardless

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026
In "Across the West" [375708/31163/26]
Posted by charles_uk at 09:54, 2nd June 2026
 
Cancellations to services between London Paddington and Reading

Due to a fault with the signalling system between London Paddington and Reading some lines are closed.

Train services running to and from these stations may be cancelled or delayed. Disruption is expected until 10:15 02/06.

There is a fault with the signalling system between Slough and Acton. The signalling system is how trains are kept a safe distance apart and directed onto the various lines along their journey. When there is a fault with the signalling system trains may need to stop at the affected signals so that the Driver can speak to the Signaller to confirm if the track ahead is clear.

The problem affects 2 of the four lines between London Paddington and Reading, so we are having to reduce the train service through the area to avoid congestion.
-
Some services between London Paddington and Oxford, and between London Paddington and Cardiff Central, will not run, in either direction.
-
Local stopping services between London Paddington and Didcot Parkway/Newbury will only run between Reading and Didcot Parkway/Newbury.
-
Most longer distance Intercity services will continue to run between London Paddington and Reading, but may be subject to delay.
-
We are working with Network Rail to be able to return to running our normal timetable as soon as possible.

Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2026
In "London to the Cotswolds" [375707/31371/14]
Posted by Witham Bobby at 09:47, 2nd June 2026
 
07:13 Great Malvern to London Paddington due 09:43 will be cancelled.
This is due to a problem in the depot.
Last Updated:02/06/2026 04:27

Real Time Trains shows the empty stock for this working, 3G14 0428 from Stoke Gifford, did not run "at the operators request"

Re: Railways Bill 2025: introducing and designing Great British Railways - general topic
In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [375706/31038/40]
Posted by Electric train at 06:08, 2nd June 2026
 
Something in a conversation that Roger Ford was having on X/Twitter earlier caught my eye.

The major saving meant to emerge from the move to GBR is supposed to be the 2% or so in fees being paid to the operators for operating their management contracts.

However, unannounced, but contained within the Railways Bill, is the fact that the rolling stock, being hired by the operators from the ROSCOs - isn't going back to the ROSCOs to be directly hired by GBR - oh no - the stock is being sub-leased by the operators to DfT/GBR.....probably charging them that 2% in admin charges to continue to do this!!

So no real savings either.....unbelievable

Possibly the way the rolling stock financing and leasing contracts were setup, and probably originally agreed by DfT, make it complex and or expensive to change the arrangement.   I would like to think GBR / DfT will be reviewing all these arrangement once the TOC are under public ownership

Re: Poland's controversial 'Highway to Hel' 666 bus revived
In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [375705/32093/52]
Posted by infoman at 05:31, 2nd June 2026
 
locally the phone code for Tetbury is 01666

and is Russian country code 007?

Re: Why are these people travelling by train?
In "Introductions and chat" [375704/32090/1]
Posted by grahame at 04:19, 2nd June 2026
 
Need to deal successfully with capacity pinchpoints first.

There are far too many currently which will severely hinder any attempt to encourage travellers

And stop introducing NEW capacity pinch points, such as new and often shorter trains. And ignore the arguments about a new 5 car train being so much better than an HST

The thread asks the question "why are these people travelling by train" and goes on to muse as to whether / why we might be missing such passengers [in the UK].

I have - on last year's trip and on this years' - hit capacity issues; they are not unique to the UK.  The matter of whether such travellers / metrics could more usefully travel by train in the UK is at the heart of the question - the metrics of how the systems could or should support it are a necessary corollary, and that is where provision policy and strategy come into play. 

In my view, the moving of TOCs from private contractors to public operators is something of a side issue - no matter who runs and specifies the thing - and the wider environment around it too, the result depends on providing what people want and will use, and having them know about it and feel and be comfortable using it.

Re: Why are these people travelling by train?
In "Introductions and chat" [375701/32090/1]
Posted by broadgage at 23:45, 1st June 2026
 
Need to deal successfully with capacity pinchpoints first.

There are far too many currently which will severely hinder any attempt to encourage travellers

And stop introducing NEW capacity pinch points, such as new and often shorter trains. And ignore the arguments about a new 5 car train being so much better than an HST

Poland's controversial 'Highway to Hel' 666 bus revived
In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [375700/32093/52]
Posted by ChrisB at 21:26, 1st June 2026
 
From the BBC



Coach operator FlixBus has announced the return of the 666 bus service to the Polish seaside resort of Hel.

It resurrects the controversial so-called "Highway to Hel" bus journey formerly run by local company PKS Gdynia.

Religious conservative groups fiercely opposed the "satanic" association of 666 with Hel, so in 2023 the number was changed to 669.

The new 13-hour route run by FlixBus will connect Kraków to Hel, passing through other major Polish regional towns and cities including the capital Warsaw.

FlixBus spokesperson Aleksander Kalenik told the Polish news service TVN24: "The number 666 was deliberately chosen as a marketing communication element, intended to increase the visibility of the connection on the popular holiday route to Hel."

Back in June 2023 a PKS Gdynia spokesperson had told media: "The management board buckled under the weight of letters and requests that were sent to us, maybe not in large numbers, but periodically for many years with a request to change the line number."

One Polish religious group had accused the bus company of "spreading satanism".

The Bible identifies 666 as the "number of the beast" and Hel is just one "l" short of the English word "hell".

Poland is a predominantly Roman Catholic nation, where the Church has traditionally been influential.

Hel is located on the tip of the 22-mile (35km) Hel Peninsula, which juts off the northern coast of Poland in the Gulf of Gdańsk.

Tourists have been drawn to Hel's sandy beaches, ancient architecture and seal sanctuary.

Re: Railways Bill 2025: introducing and designing Great British Railways - general topic
In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [375699/31038/40]
Posted by ChrisB at 21:15, 1st June 2026
Already liked by Mark A, TaplowGreen, Witham Bobby
 
Something in a conversation that Roger Ford was having on X/Twitter earlier caught my eye.

The major saving meant to emerge from the move to GBR is supposed to be the 2% or so in fees being paid to the operators for operating their management contracts.

However, unannounced, but contained within the Railways Bill, is the fact that the rolling stock, being hired by the operators from the ROSCOs - isn't going back to the ROSCOs to be directly hired by GBR - oh no - the stock is being sub-leased by the operators to DfT/GBR.....probably charging them that 2% in admin charges to continue to do this!!

So no real savings either.....unbelievable

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026
In "Across the West" [375698/31163/26]
Posted by bobm at 20:28, 1st June 2026
Already liked by Witham Bobby
 
Network Rail are saying on X that today’s problems were caused by cable theft.

Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2026
In "London to the Cotswolds" [375697/31371/14]
Posted by John D at 18:43, 1st June 2026
Already liked by Witham Bobby
 
15:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern due 18:26 will be cancelled.
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.
Last Updated:01/06/2026 15:13

"More trains than usual blah blah" Why don't they just admit that they have, for some time now, proposed a timetable to the public for which they have neither sufficient rolling stock nor traincrew?

The "unusual" number of trains needing repair seems to have become quite a regular number of trains needing repair, with nothing "unusual" about it at all

I tend to think this excuse should be just a few days per year, but seems to have become multiple times per month on a regular basis.   

Which rather suggests they are over-scheduling their stock, if cannot repair stock fast enough for number of trains in timetable

Re: Twyford parking rules could change as Elizabeth Line route opens
In "London to Reading" [375696/26895/7]
Posted by CyclingSid at 18:26, 1st June 2026
 
An update on car parking https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx21lywxpp4o

Talk is cheap?

The council said all details about where the new car park could be must remain confidential for the time being because of "potential commercial and land ownership considerations".
Does that mean the allotments are safe?

Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2026
In "London to the Cotswolds" [375695/31371/14]
Posted by charles_uk at 17:18, 1st June 2026
 
And also - and for the same reason...

17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street due 20:11 will be cancelled.
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.

20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington due 23:34 will be cancelled.
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.

Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2026
In "London to the Cotswolds" [375694/31371/14]
Posted by Mark A at 17:09, 1st June 2026
Already liked by Witham Bobby
 
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.

Always thought that that reason is one that's not fit to air in public: railway management needs to think about what it's saying and how revealing it is. I've not travelled very much but it's given me a flashback to an afternoon in East Berlin long long ago, a couple of cool days and then a stinker of a cold rainstorm, at which about one in five little cars in sight broke down and gridlocked the leaden-sky-soaked roads.

Mark

Re: North Cotswold line delays and cancellations - 2026
In "London to the Cotswolds" [375693/31371/14]
Posted by Witham Bobby at 16:39, 1st June 2026
 
15:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern due 18:26 will be cancelled.
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.
Last Updated:01/06/2026 15:13

19:02 Great Malvern to London Paddington due 21:29 will be cancelled.
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.
Last Updated:01/06/2026 15:13

"More trains than usual blah blah" Why don't they just admit that they have, for some time now, proposed a timetable to the public for which they have neither sufficient rolling stock nor traincrew?

The "unusual" number of trains needing repair seems to have become quite a regular number of trains needing repair, with nothing "unusual" about it at all

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026
In "Across the West" [375692/31163/26]
Posted by bobm at 16:11, 1st June 2026
 
Edward Burnett was formerly at the Swindon Advertiser and became noted for his restaurant reviews.

He is now at the Oxford Mail and I suspect filling in at fellow Newsquest title, the Reading Chronicle.

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026
In "Across the West" [375691/31163/26]
Posted by Marlburian at 15:16, 1st June 2026
 
A new reporter has joined the Reading Chronicle team, though this article does not make for a happy start: "Several trains to London trains and vice versa pass through Reading."

Re: Why are these people travelling by train?
In "Introductions and chat" [375690/32090/1]
Posted by ChrisB at 14:49, 1st June 2026
Already liked by Witham Bobby
 
Need to deal successfully with capacity pinchpoints first.

There are far too many currently which will severely hinder any attempt to encourage travellers

Re: IET wi-fi upgrades - pilot scheme on West of England trains
In "Across the West" [375689/31108/26]
Posted by Richard Fairhurst at 14:24, 1st June 2026
 
I tend to use my own 5G data connection when on board, rather than the "free" low performance WiFi

Likewise. GWR's wifi consistently doesn't work for me, either on phone or laptop, even in areas of good signal. I doubt the reason is hard to diagnose:


Re: Project Churchward - future regional fleet for the West, new rolling stock to replace DMUs
In "Looking forward - the next 2, 5, 10 and 20 years" [375688/27482/40]
Posted by John D at 13:17, 1st June 2026
Already liked by Witham Bobby
 
This thread has been a live for over 3 years, and it has been all talk, not even a PIN (prior Information Notice) ahead of a tender.   Zero on ordering or assembling new trains.

Wonder how much time has been incurred, or money spent on consultants, to be basically same place as were over 3 years ago.   

Of course there is a difference to 3 years ago, lots of European railways have placed orders for hundreds of vehicles (examples Portugal, Italy, Switzerland, Poland, Berlin etc).  So most (or all) the train components factories now have good order books and presumably long lead times.   So any new train is probably 2-4 years away before construction can start after order placed, or nearer 5-7 years before fleet will be available for service.   

Don't think Treasury understands consequences of not placing orders for long lead time components, vs the tens/hundreds of millions cost of patching up old trains whose expensive parts need replacing

 
The Coffee Shop forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western). The views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit https://www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site at admin@railcustomer.info if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules. Our full legal statment is at https://www.greatwesternrailway.info/legal.html

Although we are planning ahead, we don't know what the future will bring here in the Coffee Shop. We have domains "firstgreatwestern.info" for w-a-y back and also "greatwesternrailway.info"; we can also answer to "greatbritishrailways.info" too. For the future, information about Great Brisish Railways, by customers and for customers.
 
Current Running
GWR trains from JourneyCheck
 
 
Code Updated 11th January 2025