This is a test of GDPR / Cookie Acceptance [about our cookies]
Really irritating test - cookie expires in 24 hour!
Great Western Coffee Shop
26.7.2025 (Saturday) 21:52 - All running AOK
Recent Public Posts - [guest]
Re: Low water levels causing canal network closures - West Midlands, July 2025
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [363586/30493/51]
Posted by grahame at 21:42, 26th July 2025
 
Cropredy lock on the Oxford Canal is already closed, meaning that this canal is closed south of that lock already.

Odd choice - is the Claydon flight open?


Tardbigge top lock out of service too, I believe ... for different reasons, though it takes a lot of water that one!

Re: Low water levels causing canal network closures - West Midlands, July 2025
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [363585/30493/51]
Posted by grahame at 21:40, 26th July 2025
 
Lock restrictions in dry summers (and indeed in some places in moderate summers) have been common for a very long time.  When we had a share in a boat, I can recall problems on the Napton flight were almost every year, and we had problems on Hatton at one point too.   The Kennet and Avon had such problems when it re-opened that just one boat - carrying the Queen - was allowed down Caen Hill.   These days it is "back pumped"

There are now more boat passages that there were in commercial days in many places - though you wouldn't think it when you see how many boats are still on their marina moorings even on a typical day in high summer.   But then I suppose that if all the cars in the UK were being driven atound on the road at the same time, we would have gridlock.

Re: Low water levels causing canal network closures - West Midlands, July 2025
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [363584/30493/51]
Posted by ChrisB at 21:39, 26th July 2025
 
Cropredy lock on the Oxford Canal is already closed, meaning that this canal is closed south of that lock already.

Re: Samaritans to close more than 100 branches
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [363583/30487/31]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 21:39, 26th July 2025
 
That is exactly how it is, grahame. 


Re: Halifax - Keighley cycle route through tunnel?
In "Active travel: Cyclists and walkers, including how the railways deal with them" [363582/19192/50]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 21:35, 26th July 2025
 
Absolute safety is not achievable, but the risks could be reduced by CCTV monitoring, and by regular police patrols.

May I disagree with my learned friend?

'Regular police patrols' could be, for example, "Once a month, on the first Monday of each month."  That is not a deterrent.

Of far more use would be, 'Frequent, or irregular, police patrols', whereby potential miscreants would have no idea when the next blue uniform might arrive, to interrupt their dastardly acts.

CfN.

Re: Samaritans to close more than 100 branches
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [363581/30487/31]
Posted by grahame at 21:32, 26th July 2025
Already liked by froome
 
I presume that more people are seeking telephone help from the Samaritans, rather than visiting in person.


I'm not sure it was - ever - very much in person.. However, the branch network as I understand it is like little call centres where the volunteers who take some very difficult calls can be mutually supportive.  It takes a special person to man phone lines for calls like this and they need their network.   

Re: Samaritans to close more than 100 branches
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [363580/30487/31]
Posted by broadgage at 21:24, 26th July 2025
 
I presume that more people are seeking telephone help from the Samaritans, rather than visiting in person.

Re: Have YOUR kids been on a beach? or to a farm?
In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [363579/14279/31]
Posted by broadgage at 21:17, 26th July 2025
 
I was about to say it is amazing how many children see coal for the first time when they go to a heritage railways.   But I then noticed I made the same comment in this thread 11 years ago!

A neighbours kids were as surprised to see coal being used for heating in my home. This was during a prolonged power cut  The kids and mother came in to warm up as they had no heating at home.
The cats had already "evacuated" to me in protest at the absence of GCH at home.

Low water levels causing canal network closures - West Midlands, July 2025
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [363578/30493/51]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 21:09, 26th July 2025
 
From the BBC:



Increasing numbers of canals in the West Midlands are closing, due to a lack of water.

The Canal and River Trust has warned that dry conditions were causing problems at a number of locks, including Wolverhampton lock flight.

It will close from Wednesday 30 July until there is sufficient rainfall to replenish reservoirs, said the trust.

The measure was necessary to help protect vital water resources on the Wolverhampton level, which supports several other parts of the Birmingham Canal navigations, it said.

"Whilst the majority of the network is open and fully navigable, there are currently restrictions in place on certain canals," the trust said.

Other areas affected in the region include:

    Birmingham and Fazeley Canal - Minworth lock is closed

    Coventry Canal - Atherstone top lock to lock 6 has restricted passage

    Rushall Canal lock is closed

    Walsall Canal - Ryders Green lock has restricted passage

    Caldon Canal in Staffordshire - Cheddleton top lock to bottom lock is closed

Volunteer lock-keepers have been helping to manage boat traffic at lock flights "to ensure water supplies are used as sparingly as possible," said national boating manager Alex Hennessey.  "Water levels are being reviewed on a daily basis and we will remove, or introduce, water-saving measures as necessary," he added.


Re: Halifax - Keighley cycle route through tunnel?
In "Active travel: Cyclists and walkers, including how the railways deal with them" [363577/19192/50]
Posted by Mark A at 20:49, 26th July 2025
 
The route to Keighley would involve the (for the UK) singularly unusual Lees Moor Tunnel - a set of condition reports of that structure are to be found here, if the URL holds together.

Mark


https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/lees_moor_keighley_goods_tunnel/response/1145363/attach/2/FoI%20Response%20Letter%20to%20Michael%20Bradley%20Freedom%20of%20Information%20Request%20Lees%20Moor%20and%20Keighley%20Goods%20Tunnel.pdf?cookie_passthrough=1

GWR train manager jailed for 7 years for sexual assault - 22 June 2024
In "Across the West" [363576/30492/26]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 20:22, 26th July 2025
 
This historic news item is from the Daily Mail, but I have only noted it now, as it was attached to another, more recent, news item.

From the Daily Mail:

Great Western Railway train manager who sexually assaulted woman passenger, 18, as he asked to check her ticket is jailed for seven years

A Great Western Railway train manager has been jailed for seven years after he sexually assaulted an 18-year-old passenger when asking to check her ticket.

Nicholas McMurray, 38, approached the victim and asked to see her ticket, and adjusted the woman's dress, British Transport Police said.

The 18-year-old had been standing and chatting on the phone in the vestibule shortly before it arrived in Swansea when McMurray sexually assaulted her on June 22, 2024.

He continued to hold the victim until the train pulled into the station and made sexually explicit comments to her before touching her again as she got off the train.

The woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, bravely reported the incident to officers at the station.

Police found the 38-year-old standing by the stationary train when he was arrested.

Predator McMurray was 'immediately removed from duty as train manager for GWR' and no longer works there.

He has since been found guilty of sexual assault, assault by penetration as Swansea Crown Court on February 5.

Last year he was sentenced to seven years in prison and put on the sex offenders register for life.



Investigating Officer, Detective Constable Farrell, said: 'When arrested, McMurray lied to officers stating the victim had tried to kiss him and he had pushed her off. His lies continued in interview as he claimed that the victim had consented to his actions'

He added: 'McMurray completely abused his position and took advantage of this young woman. I would like to take this opportunity to thank the victim for her courage and bravery throughout the police investigation. McMurray will now have to spend a considering amount of time to reflect on the actions he took that day'

Anyone who is a victim or a witness to a sexual offence on a railway has been urged to report it by texting 61016.

A GWR spokesperson said: 'We are committed to upholding the highest standards of safety and trust for our customers and employees. As soon as we became aware of the incident, we took immediate action to remove the individual from duty and he no longer works for the business. This sentencing was only possible because of the victim's immense courage in coming forward and her strength and determination in the aftermath. As we welcome the court's decision, our thoughts remain firmly with her and her family. We extend our sincere thanks to the British Transport Police for their thorough investigation into this matter and continue to work with them to maintain the safety of our trains and at our stations.'


Police hunt for woman who sexually assaulted male train worker - 31 May 2025
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [363575/30491/51]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 19:53, 26th July 2025
 
From the Daily Mail:

Police hunt for woman who sexually assaulted male train worker as he walked through carriage

Police are hunting for a woman who allegedly sexually assaulted a male train worker as he walked through a carriage late at night.

At the time of the assault, the railway employee had been passing through a carriage as it travelled between Sutton Parkway and Shirebrook in northern Nottinghamshire. The attack is said to have occurred at around 9pm on Saturday, May 31.

Now, the British Transport Police have issued an urgent appeal for the public's assistance and are hoping to speak to a woman captured on CCTV on the day of the incident. Officers believe that she could hold vital information that could help aid their investigation. Anyone who recognises the woman has been asked to contact British Transport Police.

A spokesperson for the force said: 'Police investigating a sexual assault on a rail staff member in Nottinghamshire have released this image in connection. At around 9pm on Saturday 31 May, a member of staff was on a train between Sutton Parkway and Shirebrook.



'As he walked down the carriage, a woman sexually assaulted him. Officers would like to speak to the woman pictured as they believe she may have information that could assist their enquiries.'

Any individuals with relevant information or able to identify the woman pictured have been asked to contact the British Transport Police by texting 61016 or by calling 0800 40 50 40, quoting reference 682 of 31 May.  Information can also be reported anonymously through Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.



Re: Town's buses get £900k to improve services - Slough, July 2025
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [363574/30485/51]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 19:35, 26th July 2025
 
There are three town centres of which I have very recent experience, including some bus services:

Nailsea.
I needed to travel into Bristol early on Monday morning for a medical appointment at the BRI (yes, bobm, I know that is also the correct station code for Bristol Temple Meads ). The X9 service took me promptly from the centre of Nailsea to Bristol Bus Station in about 40 minutes - no problem. It was then only a brief stroll up to the hospital.  The return journey didn't go quite so smoothly - the X9 service on bay 14 in Marlborough Street bus station was notable for its absence, so I chose to stroll down to BRI (Bristol Temple Meads railway station ), pausing only to refresh myself in a couple of Wetherspoons on route.
The town centre in Nailsea has also seen some decline, over the years. We have lost all of our bank branches and many traditional family shop businesses. The pubs generally remain - including a new Micropub - but it seems that every other shopfront now is either a charity shop or a Turkish barbers.

Melksham.
During my recent visits to Melksham, I twice used the bus to travel from the centre of the town into the centre of Bath - Manvers Street, by the railway station. Excellent scenic (for me, as a visitor) journey on both occasions - and all for £3.
I found the centre of Melksham to be fairly lively - in a good way. Road traffic is quite heavy, but there are plenty of pedestrian crossings. There is a wide variety of shops, including some fascinating antique / collectibles. Also, there is a good selection of pubs, including an excellent Wetherspoons - The Bear.  However, once you go beyond The Bear towards the railway station, the amount of derelict commercial and industrial premises is rather depressing.

Swindon.
I have no experience of the bus services in Swindon - never had occasion to require them.
A few weeks ago, walking from Milford House (the head office of GWR) on Milford Street to the Wetherspoons ('The Sir Daniel') on Fleet Street, I was frankly depressed at the number of boarded up and derelict buildings - contrasting with the almost universal road workings, causing confusion to all pedestrians, as far as I could see. Clearly, money is being spent on public transport (bus lanes, one way systems, etc.) but it was not clear to me quite what facilities would encourage people to actually use them.

That's all from me: I'll hand over now to bobm, a Swindon resident. 


Re: Power assisted and small electric vehicles - the UK "legality" issue
In "Active travel: Cyclists and walkers, including how the railways deal with them" [363573/30489/50]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 18:43, 26th July 2025
Already liked by Marlburian
 
... route from A to B ... I also wish we were more 'Swedish'...

More ABBA, then. 


Re: Power assisted and small electric vehicles - the UK "legality" issue
In "Active travel: Cyclists and walkers, including how the railways deal with them" [363572/30489/50]
Posted by ChrisB at 17:45, 26th July 2025
 
The Swedes are generally law-abiding -= they'll ride only where they should, and if you need insurance they'll have it.

The Brits (I hate that word)/British don't do either. Ride wherever they like & provide the shortish route from A to B & try & get away without insurance.

I don't blame the UK Government. I also wish we were more 'Swedish'....

Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury
In "TransWilts line" [363571/29726/18]
Posted by TaplowGreen at 15:37, 26th July 2025
 
15:14 Swindon to Westbury due 15:58
15:14 Swindon to Westbury due 15:58 has been cancelled.
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.

16:23 Westbury to Swindon due 17:05
16:23 Westbury to Swindon due 17:05 will be cancelled.
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.

17:35 Swindon to Westbury due 18:18
17:35 Swindon to Westbury due 18:18 will be cancelled.
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.

18:35 Westbury to Swindon due 19:17
18:35 Westbury to Swindon due 19:17 will be cancelled.
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.

19:44 Swindon to Westbury due 20:29
19:44 Swindon to Westbury due 20:29 will be cancelled.
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.

Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury
In "TransWilts line" [363570/29726/18]
Posted by bobm at 13:05, 26th July 2025
 
Earlier today that quartet were advertised as being three coaches instead of two. Now shrunk to zero.  Underlines the chronic shortage of rolling stock in the central region.  The cascade of more units from the west cannot come soon enough. 

Re: Halifax - Keighley cycle route through tunnel?
In "Active travel: Cyclists and walkers, including how the railways deal with them" [363569/19192/50]
Posted by Mark A at 12:55, 26th July 2025
 
This thread might be renamed 'Halifax to Bradford cycle route through tunnel', a great lost opportunity that the entire heavily engineered system wasn't earmarked to become an active travel route at the time it went out of use, but that was a very different world - and different again to the world that the line was built to serve - I'm reminded again that a small slice of that world is captured in this video, which includes a couple of glimpses of those lines. But what is it that is moving on the road at abut 26 seconds in?

Mark

https://player.bfi.org.uk/free/film/watch-tram-ride-into-halifax-1902-1902-online


Re: Halifax - Keighley cycle route through tunnel?
In "Active travel: Cyclists and walkers, including how the railways deal with them" [363568/19192/50]
Posted by broadgage at 12:37, 26th July 2025
 
1.4 mile tunnel you say?

How would personal safety while walking through be guaranteed?

Absolute safety is not achievable, but the risks could be reduced by CCTV monitoring, and by regular police patrols.

Bath/Paddington out and back
In "The Lighter Side" [363567/30490/30]
Posted by Mark A at 12:35, 26th July 2025
Already liked by PrestburyRoad, GBM
 
tl:dr - everything worked out. The outstanding issue: a miscreant bogie (or the track, or something...)

What I thought would happen: £££, 'cos, to London and back on a friday, needed peak time travel as this was to a funeral and I then needed to be back at the end of the afternoon.

How it worked out: £25 advance single on the 06:02 up from Bath. On arrival at Paddington, to the ticket office for a £42 off-peak single for the 16:30, the last train before the evening peak -the person behind the counter, whose customer service skills were beyond  excellent, reserved a seat too. So, a return for £67, with some flexibilty to cater for a less predictable return time, so, could be worse (but this does depend on the availablity of advance fares).

On the day. Not many at all travelling on the 6:02am train from Bath, or from Swindon or from Reading, so even the buffet trolley person was on time. Paddington was quiet at 7:25am, as was the (transformative) Elizabeth line, Farringdon and Thameslink somewhat busier but London Bridge and the surrounding felt quiet even at 8:15. Lovely sunlit morning and what appeared to be a group of Danish people in  touring rowing boats, heading downstream inside of HMS Belfast before disappearing beyond Tower Bridge.

The return journey: the journey back began with some bus confusion, mainly owing to unfamiliarity with the service but also not helped by boarding a bus which had the destination board arse-about. Once onto a service heading slowly towards Thameslink's core things were more relaxed and once again a quick though steppy change at Farringdon onto the Elizabeth line and to Paddington. At the gate line, despite not being damaged my ticket jammed the reader, which resulted in a quick visit from staff to retrieve the situation (and the ticket).

The 16:30 to Taunton surprised me as it was not full and standing, no stampede needed to get aboard, and it ran to time back to Bath. The seating was in good nick and I took a photo to remind me which generation of seating they belonged to (and to admire the idiosyncratic position of the gangway handholds, most people continue to use the tops of the seats which are far better placed).

Running at speed and east of Grove for a few miles, the leading bogie experienced an almighty outbreak of hunting, which went on for a few minutes, not sure what it was there that it didn't like but it got everyone's attention.

Leaving the station and on to the buses, that is where the 'Fun' restarted, but let's draw a veil over that as it would be a shame to include it in what was otherwise a good day's travel. It would be useful if everything heading north stopped at that stop in Manvers Street - currently 50% of its capacity is taken up by the city tour buses.

Incidentally, for good measure there is a 'Bus stop suspended' notice on that stop in Manvers Street, but I didn't get close enough to see the dates, or whether this was connected with the alteration works to the former Debenhams store there.

Anyway, a photo of said seats...

Mark


https://i.postimg.cc/x8DdhsB5/iep-seats-800.jpg

Re: Power assisted and small electric vehicles - the UK "legality" issue
In "Active travel: Cyclists and walkers, including how the railways deal with them" [363566/30489/50]
Posted by broadgage at 12:31, 26th July 2025
Already liked by rogerw, grahame, Marlburian, PrestburyRoad
 
In my view, the use of small and lightweight electric vehicles should be encouraged in order to reduce fossil fuel use and local air pollution.
The law should be simplified, AND ENFORCED.

I would suggest that all electrically powered or electrically assisted vehicles, should be placed in one of three categories.

Group one. For vehicles primarily pedal powered, but with limited electric assistance. Maximum speed under electric power or electric assistance 15 MPH. Maximum empty weight 25 kilos.
Treat as cycles, no requirement for any licence, formal training, road tax, or safety hat.

Group two. For vehicles primarily electrically powered, with or without pedals, Maximum speed 30 MPH, maximum empty weight 40 kilos. Requires a basic licence, granted after passing a basic driving test, and a full theory test, third party insurance, number plates, and hard hat required. Road tax exempt. Rider to be at least 14. Brake lights and turn signals required.

Group three. No limit on speed or weight, treat as motorcycles. Full motorcycle licence needed, approved helmet required, road tax charged.

Or something similar, but keeping it simple.

Group one would also include pedestrian operated vehicles with electric assistance, carts for transporting luggage and light freight, or children. Prams and baby buggies.

Re: Power assisted and small electric vehicles - the UK "legality" issue
In "Active travel: Cyclists and walkers, including how the railways deal with them" [363565/30489/50]
Posted by grahame at 11:30, 26th July 2025
 
I am aware (you may have guessed) that my original post was a somewhat provocative extreme, but the inaccuracies of the Wiltshire PC really got my goat this morning ... brief follow up here as ... limited battery life and I'm going easy online to leave more power to take photos like have never been on the Coffee Shop before.

Re: Town's buses get £900k to improve services - Slough, July 2025
In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [363564/30485/51]
Posted by Marlburian at 10:36, 26th July 2025
 
The decline of larger town centres has been a popular topic in the media recently. Internet shopping, high car-parking charges, rogue cyclists, beggars and shop-lifters have been blamed, the last three contributing, some people think, to a feeling of unease. I now dislike visiting Reading town centre.

A friend of mine (who cycles around London) reports similar discomfort in London, where the travails of Oxford Street have been commented on.

In contrast I've enjoyed visits to Newbury, Thame, Marlborough and several other smaller towns.

Ironically, Reading Borough Council has recently firmed up its guidance on busking, which is one High Street feature that I do appreciate, sometimes donating money.

Re: Power assisted and small electric vehicles - the UK "legality" issue
In "Active travel: Cyclists and walkers, including how the railways deal with them" [363563/30489/50]
Posted by Marlburian at 10:19, 26th July 2025
 
Oh, the irony. I was a very keen cyclist, accumulating 270,000 miles, including some utility journeys, such as in the 1960s  the 15 miles between Sidmouth and Exeter libraries - and back. I thought then that "two wheels" was an excellent way for someone to get around, rather than them occupying a metal box of, say, 75 square feet. Today this is even more my opinion with the advent of SUVs. (A friend of mine recently bought one, and for 95 per cent of her mileage is the sole occupant; she complains of having to squeeze into hedges on country roads and getting her car's bodywork scratched.)

"Small electric assisted transport" has several desirable factors, but its misuse by a significant proportion of people, as mentioned by Taplow Green, brings it into disrepute. Many police forces are making token efforts to control it, seizing the occasional illegal machine and proudly proclaiming the fact. But on any trip to Reading town centre one can see a dozen more of dubious legality. Some people see them as the most popular delivery service for drugs.

Re: 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury
In "TransWilts line" [363562/29726/18]
Posted by TaplowGreen at 10:11, 26th July 2025
 
09:52 Westbury to Swindon due 10:36
09:52 Westbury to Swindon due 10:36 will be cancelled.
This is due to a broken down train.

11:05 Swindon to Westbury due 11:48
11:05 Swindon to Westbury due 11:48 will be cancelled.
This is due to a broken down train

12:17 Westbury to Swindon due 13:01
12:17 Westbury to Swindon due 13:01 will be cancelled.
This is due to a broken down train.

13:13 Swindon to Westbury due 13:55
13:13 Swindon to Westbury due 13:55 will be cancelled.
This is due to a broken down train.

Re: 175s to GWR
In "Across the West" [363561/28982/26]
Posted by John D at 08:46, 26th July 2025
Already liked by Mark A
 
Last time I looked there were 2 very overgrown sidings alongside the line on north side.   There was also a very short depot building suitable for locos and power cars.   This seems to face opposite direction to many of the sidings in the open.    There wasn't really a building suitable for 3car DMUs where bogie or engine swaps and similar maintenance could be done quickly and efficiently.  There is a long building for IETs (which I suspect has no spare capacity for a DMU fleet as it is quite narrow)

I can see three sheds with tracks into them - one short (72 m, roads 1-4), one longer (112 m, roads 5-6) and the "HST shed" (240 m, roads 7-10). So it looks as if the two smaller sheds, apart from road 1 that perhaps is no longer used, are being renovated for the 175s.

A three car class 175 is about 71m long, so only just fits in those 72m roads, although not sure if could close door and provide a clear walkway around end.

Pairs of two car units would fit in the 2 longer 112m roads, but wouldn't be able to handle 5car (117m long), or 6car (142m long) without splitting into two trains, which adds time and complexity.  It is of course common practice to run early/late empty trains to/from depot as pairs of units. 

Re: Power assisted and small electric vehicles - the UK "legality" issue
In "Active travel: Cyclists and walkers, including how the railways deal with them" [363560/30489/50]
Posted by John D at 08:22, 26th July 2025
 
The worst I have ever seen, was an old guy on one of those 4 wheel mobility shopping vehicles with clear plastic rain roof.

But wasn't pottering along the pavement, he was driving in middle lane of 3 on A13 dual carriageway near Barking, causing traffic chaos.

If ever there was need for enforcement for safety reasons that was it.

Re: Power assisted and small electric vehicles - the UK "legality" issue
In "Active travel: Cyclists and walkers, including how the railways deal with them" [363559/30489/50]
Posted by Electric train at 08:13, 26th July 2025
Already liked by TaplowGreen, eightonedee
 
Grahame the population of Sweden is smaller than that of London with Sweden is twice the Sq km of the UK the density of population Sweden is 25 people per square km, the UK has a density of 281 per square km. Based on risk of death and injury in a collision involving a small electric assisted transport the risk in Sweden is much lower than the UK.

In the UK we need to have regulation / registration and control, with the requirement for insurance over all powered transport used in public places, that is why in 1977 there restrictions placed on 50cc motorbikes for 16 year olds with L plates; the requirement for crash helmets for motor bike uses and seat belts in cars all driven by the number of deaths and serious injury


Re: Berth Maps - more accurate train movement data with Exeter area demonstration
In "Shorter journeys in Devon - Central, North and South" [363558/30486/24]
Posted by GBM at 08:07, 26th July 2025
 
Wow!

Excellent, thank you.

Re: Power assisted and small electric vehicles - the UK "legality" issue
In "Active travel: Cyclists and walkers, including how the railways deal with them" [363557/30489/50]
Posted by TaplowGreen at 07:51, 26th July 2025
Already liked by GBM, Marlburian
 
I think "state sponsored vendetta" is overstating it somewhat and a lot of people are heartily sick and tired of having to dive for cover when e-bikes/scooters etc come flying around corners/down the pavement at considerable speed with those on board apparently oblivious to pedestrians.

Also being used on the road by delivery drivers/riders with little or no regard for the law or highway code.

I appreciate that by no means all users are irresponsible, but a balance has to be struck and it's the Police/Ambulance service who end up having to pick up/scrape up the pieces, so they are right to be concerned and enforce where appropriate.

Keeping people safe is the Government's first responsibility.

 
The Coffee Shop forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western). The views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit https://www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site at admin@railcustomer.info if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules. Our full legal statment is at https://www.greatwesternrailway.info/legal.html

Although we are planning ahead, we don't know what the future will bring here in the Coffee Shop. We have domains "firstgreatwestern.info" for w-a-y back and also "greatwesternrailway.info"; we can also answer to "greatbritishrailways.info" too. For the future, information about Great Brisish Railways, by customers and for customers.
 
Current Running
GWR trains from JourneyCheck
 
 
Code Updated 11th January 2025