This is a test of GDPR / Cookie Acceptance [about our cookies]
Really irritating test - cookie expires in 24 hour!
Great Western Coffee Shop
As at 9th March 2025 23:11 GMT
Recent Public Posts - [guest]
Re: Grotty Scotty Piccies
In "The Lighter Side" [359242/30004/30]
Posted by eightonedee at 22:58, 9th March 2025
 
Is 2 Duirinish? I think I've only been twice, once by road, but it seems to be popular with Highland cattle and looks like it's been plonked in a stereotypical Scottish Highland landscape!

Re: Grotty Scotty Piccies
In "The Lighter Side" [359240/30004/30]
Posted by DR7835 at 22:33, 9th March 2025
 
4. Site of former Dundee Esplanade station looking back at the Tay Bridge from the Northern end.

Re: Grotty Scotty Piccies
In "The Lighter Side" [359239/30004/30]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 22:19, 9th March 2025
 
That would have been my second answer. 

I only know the Edinburgh one because I used to work for a Scottish financial services company, and their head office is in the shadow of Edinburgh Castle.  When we from the Bristol branch travelled to Edinburgh for team meetings, I was so envious of one of my colleagues there: her desk overlooked, through a full height picture window, the entire castle.  How inspiring is that, for a workstation? 

CfN. 

Re: Grotty Scotty Piccies
In "The Lighter Side" [359238/30004/30]
Posted by PhilWakely at 21:24, 9th March 2025
 
7. Tay Bridge

Re: Grotty Scotty Piccies
In "The Lighter Side" [359237/30004/30]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 21:07, 9th March 2025
 
1.  Edinburgh, Waverley station, looking up to the castle.

Grotty Scotty Piccies
In "The Lighter Side" [359236/30004/30]
Posted by grahame at 20:55, 9th March 2025
 
Some pictures take in or from a train or zoomed - fuzzies, reflections and so forth about - can you identify one each ...

1.


2.


3.


4.


5.


6.


7.

Re: 21 March 2025 - TravelWatch SouthWest General meeting
In "Diary - what's happening when?" [359235/30000/34]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 20:38, 9th March 2025
 
I'm sorry for that confusion, ChrisB:  I've now moved your post here and will amend the topic headings for those historic TravelWatch SouthWest meetings.

CfN. 

Re: 21st March 2025 - TravelWatch SouthWest General meeting
In "Diary - what's happening when?" [359234/30000/34]
Posted by ChrisB at 20:11, 9th March 2025
 
This thread now has the wrong subect line and dopes not refer to the March 21 2025 meeting!

Re: Rolling stock projections - ongoing discussion
In "Looking forward - the next 5, 10 and 20 years" [359233/26134/40]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 19:40, 9th March 2025
 
Fair comment: this ongoing topic is no longer specific to any particular 'on this day', so I've broadened it here.

CfN. 

Re: Train fare dodger told to pay nearly £1,000
In "Fare's Fair" [359232/29998/4]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 19:31, 9th March 2025
Already liked by johnneyw
 
It would be worth paying £41.50, purely to be able to enjoy this view out of a train window, on a journey between Didcot Parkway and Cardiff Central:



From the BBC.

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2025
In "Across the West" [359231/29650/26]
Posted by BBM at 19:22, 9th March 2025
 
I’m on the 19:04 EL train from TWY (I’m going to Hayes) which left from P2 (which I was fortunate to aim for as according to RTT the previous one ran 13 minutes late and didn’t call there). This particular train is non-stopping Taplow and Burnham as indeed all EL trains are doing this evening with no advice that I’ve seen or heard so I don’t know what passengers to and from those stations are meant to do.

Also all the GWR trains on the PAD-DID route are shown on the screens at TWY as cancelled - from RTT it looks like they’re running but not stopping at TWY or MAI as in the message posted above.

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2025
In "Across the West" [359230/29650/26]
Posted by grahame at 18:49, 9th March 2025
 
How would you describe that piece of hard-coded text then?

* An apology. 
* An expression of care in acknowledging it is not as it should be.

I'm not sure it even needs a title though 

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2025
In "Across the West" [359229/29650/26]
Posted by ChrisB at 18:45, 9th March 2025
 
How would you describe that piece of hard-coded text then?

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2025
In "Across the West" [359228/29650/26]
Posted by grahame at 18:42, 9th March 2025
 
Customer Advice
We are sorry for the delay to your journey today.

Is it just me - or is that really NOT customer advice?

I would expect "Customer advice" to be something like "People who normally use GWR trains to Maidenhead or Telford should allow an extra  half hour and will need to change at Reading if coming from further west" . It actually advises the customers what to do!

Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2025
In "Across the West" [359227/29650/26]
Posted by grahame at 18:34, 9th March 2025
 
Alterations to services between Reading and Slough

Due to a points failure between Reading and Slough some lines are blocked.

Train services running to and from these stations may be delayed or revised. Twyford and Maidenhead will not be served. Disruption is expected until 21:00 09/03.

Customer Advice
We are sorry for the delay to your journey today.


Can you tell me more about the incident?

Due to a points failure at Twyford, GWR services cannot call at Twyford and Maidenhead. Elizabeth line services can still call at these stations.

Re: Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion
In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [359226/231/28]
Posted by Red Squirrel at 18:18, 9th March 2025
Already liked by Chris from Nailsea
 
I wouldn't have.

Re: Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion
In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [359225/231/28]
Posted by grahame at 17:47, 9th March 2025
 
https://www.somersetlive.co.uk/news/somerset-news/portishead-railway-line-group-criticised-9996451

I am not sure whether I should be giving that space.  All for expression of different views and bringing all the ideas out, but isn't now the time with a decision made and so many parties aligned in the view that the public transport connection to Portishead should be restored as a railway for parties that think it is not an ideal solution to let them get on with it.

The Portishead Bus Campaign is in the press again telling everyone "The Portishead Busway Campaign has labelled the return of trains between Bristol and Portishead as "ill-conceived", "scandalous" and "pure kneejerk nostalgia"" ... and suggesting again their solution of a rubber matted bus way. All they (who are they - I can only find one name associated with it) in my view is to break the consensus - they (or Barry) want(s) better public transport and so do we - a shame to divide the public transport advocates and risk ending up with nothing. 

30,000 threads - the Coffee Shop
In "News, Help and Assistance" [359224/30002/29]
Posted by grahame at 17:34, 9th March 2025
Already liked by Mark A
 
https://www.passenger.chat/r30000.html

Another milestone passed - topic number 30,000.  There are just shy of 25,800 topics on the forum as around 13% have been merged and a tiny number - my guess is less than 1% - have been deleted. 1135 members have contributed with posts (920 making multiple posts) which total 356192 in number, no one member posting more than 12%.

I happen to have hit no. 30,000 on the agenda and call for TravelWatch SouthWest a week on Friday - 21st March 2025. 


Re: Taxi access to stations
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [359223/29997/5]
Posted by Mark A at 17:17, 9th March 2025
Already liked by Chris from Nailsea
 
*Admires Nailsea and Backwell station and surrounds on Google Streetview*

Ah, of course, the Bristol and Exeter Railway. Money was squeaky-tight.

Mark

Re: Why no London trains from Bath Spa 2/3?
In "London to Swindon and Bristol" [359221/29969/10]
Posted by ChrisB at 16:17, 9th March 2025
 
Suspect engineering trains getting the way for that, Infoman.

The lines are only shut to passenger & freight trains. They have to get equipment to sites to/from each end.

Watch: Man survives being run over by train
In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [359220/29999/52]
Posted by ChrisB at 16:13, 9th March 2025
 
well, I wouldn't directly embed the sort of video....but this is on the BBC website.

It is actually amazing - the guy is drunk asleep & is not woken by the Peruvian train - but gets up after a definite collision with the train....

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/cq6yzll9j92o

Re: Rolling stock projections- ongoing discussion
In "Looking forward - the next 5, 10 and 20 years" [359219/26134/40]
Posted by ChrisB at 16:09, 9th March 2025
 
Updating the subject header?

Train fare dodger told to pay nearly £1,000
In "Fare's Fair" [359218/29998/4]
Posted by ChrisB at 16:06, 9th March 2025
 
From the BBC

A man who failed to pay his £41.50 train fare has been told to pay nearly £1,000 in fines and costs.

Kyle Brown, 22, of Wootton, Oxfordshire, was found to have dodged paying for his journey between Didcot Parkway and Cardiff Central stations on 1 June 2024.

He denied not paying his fare in January but Oxford magistrates found him guilty in his absence on 26 February.

He was told to pay £600 costs and a victim surcharge of £88, fined £220 and told to pay compensation of £41.50 - a total of £949.50. Brown must pay that by 26 March.

Re: Ticket offices - changes afoot?
In "Fare's Fair" [359217/29965/4]
Posted by ChrisB at 16:01, 9th March 2025
 
That seems to be pretty much what the DfT wanted to do in England

Re: Taxi access to stations
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [359216/29997/5]
Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 15:11, 9th March 2025
 
At Nailsea & Backwell, there is no taxi rank and neither taxis nor private hire cars ply for trade anywhere near the station.

The same is true of Bedminster, Parson Street, Yatton and Worle - stations either side of Nailsea & Backwell on the main line.

Re: Cirencester branch: Thames bridge question
In "Railway History and related topics" [359215/29996/55]
Posted by Mark A at 14:47, 9th March 2025
Already liked by Chris from Nailsea
 
Thanks for this. So... a single, substantial & distinctive masonry arch. Somewhere, I've read some derogatory comment about it (the author biassed by their feelings for this modern-world intrusion into the world of the upper Thames). Perhaps it did put a kink into the road, or perhaps someone was keen to demolish it for the masonry, which elsewhere on the Cirencester branch is good stuff.

Good to have a name too: Clayfurlong bridge (marked as a viaduct on some OS maps).

(The photos are from the same negative - in the tinted one, someone's removed the figure...)

It was quite a dramatic crossing of the valley. Here's the view from upstream, the gap slightly lost in trees.

Mark


Re: Taxi access to stations
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [359214/29997/5]
Posted by ChrisB at 13:56, 9th March 2025
 
Also, a significant taxi-travel requirement is for accessible vehicles and I'm not sure how this is met now.

Our licencing council insist that all new 'black cabs' are accessible. So we have plenty here.

Private Hire are a law unto themselves - but definitely realise the amount of work that is out there for accessible vehicles, so most companies have some....but they don't all work around the clock, so getting one late in the evening is quite a lottery unless booked well in advance.

Re: 25th May 2025 - SWR Franchise expires and services Nationalised
In "South Western services" [359213/29993/42]
Posted by Timmer at 13:47, 9th March 2025
Already liked by Chris from Nailsea, TaplowGreen, eightonedee
 
Nope
Is the correct answer.

Re: Taxi access to stations
In "Buses and other ways to travel" [359212/29997/5]
Posted by grahame at 13:35, 9th March 2025
 
This sounds like a job for a poll or two. ...

I considered that, but then tried to think how I would do / write that and failed to find an adequate approach.

 
The Coffee Shop forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western). The views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit https://www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site at admin@railcustomer.info if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules. Our full legal statment is at https://www.greatwesternrailway.info/legal.html

Although we are planning ahead, we don't know what the future will bring here in the Coffee Shop. We have domains "firstgreatwestern.info" for w-a-y back and also "greatwesternrailway.info"; we can also answer to "greatbritishrailways.info" too. For the future, information about Great Brisish Railways, by customers and for customers.
 
Current Running
GWR trains from JourneyCheck
 
 
Code Updated 11th January 2025